Showing posts with label barnet newman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label barnet newman. Show all posts
Thursday, 9 December 2010
iconoclasm II
The idea for a ban on images, how and why is it born?
In the ten commandments, inscripted on two stone tablets which God wrote with his finger and delivered by Moses, it is on a very important second place :
I am the Lord your God, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery;
1 : Do not have any other gods before me.
2 : You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
3 : You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me, but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Because images can be powerful and therefore dangerous?
People are simple and scared and therefore they like to worship an image, of a golden calf for example. Is it that bad? God is a jealous god and that is very human quality. He or she or it has no form, god is fire, or light, sound, clouds, thunder and lightning.
Why is that jealous god so afraid of image making?
Abstract or figurative images are they equal from power?
The most powerful images are pornographic images?
"The more power pictures have, the less we seem to know about how they operate"
(Peter Weibel in Iconoclash).
To combat the figurative image, you must first acknowledge, admire and confess the figurative image?
Idolatry and iconoclasm are finally dealing with the pornographic image?
Powerful images in the vast flood of images today are images of what? Of sex, of violence, of war, of death?
Images don't cry...
Labels:
barnet newman,
iconoclasm,
idolatry,
jeff koons,
michelangelo,
ten commandments
Tuesday, 18 May 2010
the destruction of art

Barnett Newman's "who is afraid..." and "cathedra" both cut up in the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam some time ago.
The destruction of art & the art of destruction aren't two sides of the same coin. Trying to evoke the destructive element in creating art is difficult. Creating drawings is a quite positive act and perhaps a positive belief. It can be done with negative feelings like being bored, feeling ugly, stupid, lazy, ill, sad and mad. Working with destruction is a sentiment difficult to make clear. Destruction as part of creating new drawings. Violence and vandalism should be part of the final drawing. Soon I expect to make it clear.
Labels:
barnet newman,
inspirations
Wednesday, 14 April 2010
visiting Jan Andriesse

As homage to Piet Mondriaan and to possess a Mondriaan himself the painter Jan Andriesse copied Mondriaans "composition with yellow lines" (1933 / 80 x 80 cm / Haags Gemeentemuseum) as precise as possible. By copying it he studied it and he found some remarkable details about the small painting. The yellow line on the left and the yellow line on top these lines have the same width. If they are continued outside the painting they form a square as is to see in the small drawing on the left bottom corner. Mondriaan said he didn't use mathematical systems to construct his paintings, he worked directly with his intuition on the canvas by drawing with charcoal the compositions he had in mind. It could take weeks and sometimes months to make corrections and the composition was crystallized enough to start with painting colours. For Jan Andriesse it was also the most difficult task to do, mixing the right yellow colour.
Bottom left corner of the photo a small poster of German propaganda : "British planes have no mercy for peaceful citizens, therefore stay at home".

Yesterday I visited Jan in his studio boat on the Amstel river. I had to because he is one of the rare artists who is working with the golden ratio. Yesterday afternoon he explained to me the triangle of Kepler. A triangle Jan Andriesse discovered quite some time ago when he was living in New York. He used to paint on a rectangle with the proportions 1 : 1,25. Slowly the proportions of the rectangle changed in 1 : 1,27. By reading and studying he discovered Kepler and his triangle with the proportions of 1 : 1,272.
Thank you Jan for explaining Kepler's triangle. For explaining Barnet Newman's wide rectangles. For telling many interesting stories about mathematics and philosophy. For the gossip and the one liners : "stay at home, read Baruch..."

The sine wave or sinusoid is a mathematical function that describes a smooth repetitive oscillation. On the photo there are 9 moulds or templates Jan Andriesse made with the sinusoid that represents the decreasing wave of water when it is split by a boat or duck. Jan tried to make paintings with the 9 beautiful templates but he failed again and again. The reason why was explained by Jan by a quote of T. S. Eliot : "by dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good". The 9 templates finally delivers paintings which are simply too beautiful, too boring, too perfect. The human irrational disappeared and therefore the result is dissatisfying.

On the studio wall of Jan Andriesse : a rectangle after the triangle of Kepler, one of the diagonals in the rectangle which is from the same length as the elegant hanging chain bow.
Less is more, stay at home, read Baruch ...
Labels:
barnet newman,
inspirations,
jan andriesse,
kepler triangle,
mondriaan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

